LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Comments in Raycraft article don't jibe with reality
The El Cerrito Wire report on Gerry Raycraft’s parting remarks contains
several statements that do not jibe with reality. Most of those have to
do with what he said about Redevelopment in El Cerrito. Let’s take a look
at the record.
He did not say in so many words but he implies that Home Depot is an
Agency accomplishment. In fact, it was strictly a market-driven project
begun well in advance by negotiations with the Adachi family and other
property owners, of which there were several. The assembling of those
parcels somehow took place without the need for Redevelopment action, a
main reason he cites for the Agency’s existence.
As to “blight”removal, a major such area is one owned by the Agency on
Eastshore. It is a leftover from a failed Agency project from 1987. The
current hope is that the expansion of the hotel at Potrero will resolve
that problem, but Agency involvement would be minimal.
As one who has served on the Project Listen group which studied
Redevelopment, the Redevelopment Advisory Committee, and the present
Committee of the Whole, I feel qualified to comment. The results of the
findings of those groups are available in reports at City Hall, and they
are far from laudatory.
Raycraft showed arrogance by denigrating the hard-working volunteers I
have served with as being “non-professional", saying they “usurped
analysis and decisions normally left to city staff”. In point of fact, a
highly skilled professional accountant was deeply involved in the
studies. I hold a master’s degree in mechanical engineering, and I view
myself as professional. There would have been no “usurpation” if the
analyses and decisions of city staff had passed muster, which they did
Raycraft seems given to these kinds of put-downs. In still another matter
he characterized a volunteer person, whose profession is traffic
analysis, as “amateur" in the case of an analysis regarding traffic in
the Del Norte area.
As to the use of Redevelopment funds (that’s our money, by the way), the
Agency is so deeply in debt that it has little or no money to further
subsidize anything. That debt includes nearly $1 million it owes the city
for staff services rendered over several years. That is the main reason
the Council decided to accept a recommendation from still another
“non-professional” group (The Committee of the Whole) to place the Agency
in hiatus until debt to the city is repaid. There remains some $13
million in Agency bond and note debt that must be repaid over time with
our tax dollars.
Based on careful accounting, it was learned that NONE of the Agency’s
projects would ever pay for themselves via increased property tax
receipts, the Agency’s main income. The Target store analysis showed a
deficit over time of some $9 million. Del Norte Place is also in deficit
and so is Del Norte Market Place. All were subsidized with our tax money.
Raycraft’s claim of a $250,000 sales tax benefit to the city from Target
comes just from an estimate based on the store’s square footage. In fact,
the total sales tax received by El Cerrito after the store had been in
operation for a year were slightly less than for the prior year.
If Raycraft carries with him the attitude shown in the article to his
next job I say, “Good luck, Manteca!”
Editor's Note: Raycraft made it clear in the interview with the Wire that Home
Depot was not a Redevelopment Agency project.
Run dates: 2000-07-06 - 2000-07-20